How is accountability reinforced among public officials in R.A. No. 6713?

Accountability among public officials in R.A. No. 6713 is reinforced through mechanisms that emphasize regular reporting, transparency, and consequences for wrongful acts or misfeasance. This approach ensures that public officials are not only expected to adhere to ethical standards but are also monitored for compliance. Regular reporting mandates that officials provide updates on their activities and administrative actions, thus promoting transparency and making it easier for the public to stay informed about their work.

Additionally, the law establishes specific consequences for misconduct, which serves as a deterrent against unethical behavior. These measures collectively foster a culture of accountability, as public officials understand that they are answerable for their actions and that there are systems in place to monitor their compliance with ethical standards.

In contrast, the other choices fall short of establishing a robust accountability framework; social media updates do not provide formal accountability mechanisms, allowing personal discretion without checks can lead to abuses of power, and relying solely on complaint filings diminishes proactive oversight and accountability.